device vs electroNic
device and electroNic compared on the HLTV record: rating, K/D, ADR, KAST and headshot percentage. device averages 1.15 against electroNic's 1.06. device leads on 4 of the 6 measures that separate them. The other one is too close to call.
Form
| device | electroNic | Gap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLTV rating | 1.15 | 1.06 | device +0.09 |
| K/D | 1.24 | 1.09 | device +0.15 |
| ADR | 79.2 | 81.0 | electroNic +1.8 |
| KAST | 71.7% | 71.7% | too close to call |
| Kills / round | 0.77 | 0.72 | device +0.05 |
| Deaths / round | 0.62 | 0.67 | device +0.05 |
| Headshot % | 34.7% | 49.8% | electroNic +15.1 |
Career averages over every map on record. Deaths per round is the one line where the lower number is the better one. A gap smaller than a quarter of the spread across all ranked pros is reported as too close to call rather than as a win — players a single place apart in the ranking routinely differ by more.
Career
| device | electroNic | |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 4 | 1 |
| Majors played | 17 | 13 |
| Maps played | 2,464 | 1,885 |
| Age | — | — |
Side by side but not compared: maps played and age measure how long someone has played rather than how well. They are what the averages above rest on.
Full profiles
- device — Denmark · 100 Thieves
- electroNic — Russia · BC.Game