device vs GuardiaN
device and GuardiaN compared on the HLTV record: rating, K/D, ADR, KAST and headshot percentage. device averages 1.15 against GuardiaN's 1.10. device leads on 6 of the 6 measures that separate them. The other one is too close to call.
Form
| device | GuardiaN | Gap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLTV rating | 1.15 | 1.10 | device +0.05 |
| K/D | 1.24 | 1.18 | device +0.06 |
| ADR | 79.2 | 71.5 | device +7.7 |
| KAST | 71.7% | 69.9% | device +1.8 |
| Kills / round | 0.77 | 0.73 | device +0.04 |
| Deaths / round | 0.62 | 0.62 | too close to call |
| Headshot % | 34.7% | 29.8% | device +4.9 |
Career averages over every map on record. Deaths per round is the one line where the lower number is the better one. A gap smaller than a quarter of the spread across all ranked pros is reported as too close to call rather than as a win — players a single place apart in the ranking routinely differ by more.
Career
| device | GuardiaN | |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 4 | 0 |
| Majors played | 17 | 14 |
| Maps played | 2,464 | 1,681 |
| Age | — | — |
Side by side but not compared: maps played and age measure how long someone has played rather than how well. They are what the averages above rest on.