device vs m0NESY
device and m0NESY compared on the HLTV record: rating, K/D, ADR, KAST and headshot percentage. device averages 1.15 against m0NESY's 1.25. m0NESY leads on 6 of the 6 measures that separate them. The other one is too close to call.
Form
| device | m0NESY | Gap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLTV rating | 1.15 | 1.25 | m0NESY +0.10 |
| K/D | 1.24 | 1.34 | m0NESY +0.10 |
| ADR | 79.2 | 80.2 | too close to call |
| KAST | 71.7% | 74.9% | m0NESY +3.2 |
| Kills / round | 0.77 | 0.79 | m0NESY +0.02 |
| Deaths / round | 0.62 | 0.59 | m0NESY +0.03 |
| Headshot % | 34.7% | 39.7% | m0NESY +5.0 |
Career averages over every map on record. Deaths per round is the one line where the lower number is the better one. A gap smaller than a quarter of the spread across all ranked pros is reported as too close to call rather than as a win — players a single place apart in the ranking routinely differ by more.
Career
| device | m0NESY | |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 4 | 1 |
| Majors played | 17 | 7 |
| Maps played | 2,464 | 950 |
| Age | — | — |
Side by side but not compared: maps played and age measure how long someone has played rather than how well. They are what the averages above rest on.