device vs ropz
device and ropz compared on the HLTV record: rating, K/D, ADR, KAST and headshot percentage. device averages 1.15 against ropz's 1.15. Honours even — they lead 3 measures each. The other one is too close to call.
Form
| device | ropz | Gap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLTV rating | 1.15 | 1.15 | too close to call |
| K/D | 1.24 | 1.21 | device +0.03 |
| ADR | 79.2 | 78.1 | device +1.1 |
| KAST | 71.7% | 73.3% | ropz +1.6 |
| Kills / round | 0.77 | 0.74 | device +0.03 |
| Deaths / round | 0.62 | 0.61 | ropz +0.01 |
| Headshot % | 34.7% | 52.4% | ropz +17.7 |
Career averages over every map on record. Deaths per round is the one line where the lower number is the better one. A gap smaller than a quarter of the spread across all ranked pros is reported as too close to call rather than as a win — players a single place apart in the ranking routinely differ by more.
Career
| device | ropz | |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 4 | 3 |
| Majors played | 17 | 13 |
| Maps played | 2,464 | 1,899 |
| Age | — | — |
Side by side but not compared: maps played and age measure how long someone has played rather than how well. They are what the averages above rest on.