device vs ScreaM
device and ScreaM compared on the HLTV record: rating, K/D, ADR, KAST and headshot percentage. device averages 1.15 against ScreaM's 1.09. device leads on 5 of the 6 measures that separate them. The other one is too close to call.
Form
| device | ScreaM | Gap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLTV rating | 1.15 | 1.09 | device +0.06 |
| K/D | 1.24 | 1.12 | device +0.12 |
| ADR | 79.2 | 79.0 | too close to call |
| KAST | 71.7% | 71.1% | device +0.6 |
| Kills / round | 0.77 | 0.74 | device +0.03 |
| Deaths / round | 0.62 | 0.66 | device +0.04 |
| Headshot % | 34.7% | 68.1% | ScreaM +33.4 |
Career averages over every map on record. Deaths per round is the one line where the lower number is the better one. A gap smaller than a quarter of the spread across all ranked pros is reported as too close to call rather than as a win — players a single place apart in the ranking routinely differ by more.
Career
| device | ScreaM | |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 4 | 0 |
| Majors played | 17 | 9 |
| Maps played | 2,464 | 1,440 |
| Age | — | — |
Side by side but not compared: maps played and age measure how long someone has played rather than how well. They are what the averages above rest on.