electroNic vs f0rest
electroNic and f0rest compared on the HLTV record: rating, K/D, ADR, KAST and headshot percentage. electroNic averages 1.06 against f0rest's 1.10. f0rest leads on 4 of the 6 measures that separate them. The other one is too close to call.
Form
| electroNic | f0rest | Gap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLTV rating | 1.06 | 1.10 | f0rest +0.04 |
| K/D | 1.09 | 1.16 | f0rest +0.07 |
| ADR | 81.0 | 76.2 | electroNic +4.8 |
| KAST | 71.7% | 70.5% | electroNic +1.2 |
| Kills / round | 0.72 | 0.75 | f0rest +0.03 |
| Deaths / round | 0.67 | 0.65 | f0rest +0.02 |
| Headshot % | 49.8% | 52.0% | too close to call |
Career averages over every map on record. Deaths per round is the one line where the lower number is the better one. A gap smaller than a quarter of the spread across all ranked pros is reported as too close to call rather than as a win — players a single place apart in the ranking routinely differ by more.
Career
| electroNic | f0rest | |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 1 | 1 |
| Majors played | 13 | 12 |
| Maps played | 1,885 | 2,117 |
| Age | — | — |
Side by side but not compared: maps played and age measure how long someone has played rather than how well. They are what the averages above rest on.
Full profiles
- electroNic — Russia · BC.Game
- f0rest — Sweden · Retired