electroNic vs ScreaM
electroNic and ScreaM compared on the HLTV record: rating, K/D, ADR, KAST and headshot percentage. electroNic averages 1.06 against ScreaM's 1.09. ScreaM leads on 5 of the 7 measures that separate them.
Form
| electroNic | ScreaM | Gap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLTV rating | 1.06 | 1.09 | ScreaM +0.03 |
| K/D | 1.09 | 1.12 | ScreaM +0.03 |
| ADR | 81.0 | 79.0 | electroNic +2.0 |
| KAST | 71.7% | 71.1% | electroNic +0.6 |
| Kills / round | 0.72 | 0.74 | ScreaM +0.02 |
| Deaths / round | 0.67 | 0.66 | ScreaM +0.01 |
| Headshot % | 49.8% | 68.1% | ScreaM +18.3 |
Career averages over every map on record. Deaths per round is the one line where the lower number is the better one. A gap smaller than a quarter of the spread across all ranked pros is reported as too close to call rather than as a win — players a single place apart in the ranking routinely differ by more.
Career
| electroNic | ScreaM | |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 1 | 0 |
| Majors played | 13 | 9 |
| Maps played | 1,885 | 1,440 |
| Age | — | — |
Side by side but not compared: maps played and age measure how long someone has played rather than how well. They are what the averages above rest on.
Full profiles
- electroNic — Russia · BC.Game
- ScreaM — Belgium · Clutchain