GuardiaN vs ScreaM
GuardiaN and ScreaM compared on the HLTV record: rating, K/D, ADR, KAST and headshot percentage. GuardiaN averages 1.10 against ScreaM's 1.09. ScreaM leads on 3 of the 5 measures that separate them. The other 2 are too close to call.
Form
| GuardiaN | ScreaM | Gap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLTV rating | 1.10 | 1.09 | too close to call |
| K/D | 1.18 | 1.12 | GuardiaN +0.06 |
| ADR | 71.5 | 79.0 | ScreaM +7.5 |
| KAST | 69.9% | 71.1% | ScreaM +1.2 |
| Kills / round | 0.73 | 0.74 | too close to call |
| Deaths / round | 0.62 | 0.66 | GuardiaN +0.04 |
| Headshot % | 29.8% | 68.1% | ScreaM +38.3 |
Career averages over every map on record. Deaths per round is the one line where the lower number is the better one. A gap smaller than a quarter of the spread across all ranked pros is reported as too close to call rather than as a win — players a single place apart in the ranking routinely differ by more.
Career
| GuardiaN | ScreaM | |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 0 | 0 |
| Majors played | 14 | 9 |
| Maps played | 1,681 | 1,440 |
| Age | — | — |
Side by side but not compared: maps played and age measure how long someone has played rather than how well. They are what the averages above rest on.