NiKo vs ScreaM
NiKo and ScreaM compared on the HLTV record: rating, K/D, ADR, KAST and headshot percentage. NiKo averages 1.14 against ScreaM's 1.09. NiKo leads on 5 of the 6 measures that separate them. The other one is too close to call.
Form
| NiKo | ScreaM | Gap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLTV rating | 1.14 | 1.09 | NiKo +0.05 |
| K/D | 1.18 | 1.12 | NiKo +0.06 |
| ADR | 84.5 | 79.0 | NiKo +5.5 |
| KAST | 71.8% | 71.1% | NiKo +0.7 |
| Kills / round | 0.78 | 0.74 | NiKo +0.04 |
| Deaths / round | 0.66 | 0.66 | too close to call |
| Headshot % | 51.4% | 68.1% | ScreaM +16.7 |
Career averages over every map on record. Deaths per round is the one line where the lower number is the better one. A gap smaller than a quarter of the spread across all ranked pros is reported as too close to call rather than as a win — players a single place apart in the ranking routinely differ by more.
Career
| NiKo | ScreaM | |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 1 | 0 |
| Majors played | 17 | 9 |
| Maps played | 2,334 | 1,440 |
| Age | — | — |
Side by side but not compared: maps played and age measure how long someone has played rather than how well. They are what the averages above rest on.